Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Coal Region Canary
Coal Region CanaryCoal Region Canary

Schuylkill County News

Pottsville vs. Schuylkill County in Fight Over GIANT Property

pottsville vs schuylkill county giant property

pottsville vs schuylkill county giant property

The fight over the former GIANT grocery store property entered another round this week.

Pottsville continues to berate Schuylkill County officials over their apparent insistence on purchasing the 2.1 acre lot in the city’s downtown area.

And it seems the County government just doesn’t care what Pottsville thinks.

Pottsville and Schuylkill County Spar Over GIANT Property

The City of Pottsville wants the former GIANT property to hit the open market. The hope is a private investor will come in and buy the property and keep it as a taxable entity. City officials say taxpayers can’t afford to lose a valuable taxable property. And putting the valuable property in the hands of County government would be counter to the City’s revitalization plans.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The County government doesn’t seem to give too much of a damn what Pottsville thinks. But why the County wants the property remains a mystery.

Depending on who you ask at the Courthouse, the former grocery store property could become a pre-release prison center. Or it could be used to expand County offices and give employees a chance to space out a little bit more.

No matter what their intention, they don’t really care what Pottsville wants.

This week, however, things came to a head again as the two sides sparred in public. Well, it was more like Pottsville delivered the punches while the County just propped itself up against the ropes and absorbed the hits.

Pottsville Approves Resolution Opposing County Purchase


The fight started on Monday.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

At the regular City Council meeting, members unanimously approved a resolution to oppose the County’s potential purchase of the former GIANT property, according to the Republican Herald.

The move is more symbolic than anything. A resolution like this can’t actually block the County from moving forward with its plan but it puts the City’s opinion on the matter on the record.

Previously, several City Council members and Mayor Jim Muldowney have voice their individual opposition to the proposed purchase, especially the idea of a possible pre-release prison on the site.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Schuylkill County Commissioners Read the Riot Act

The fight spilled over into Wednesday morning’s Schuylkill County Commissioners meeting.

Luckily, the shoddy Zoom connection the County hosted held up long enough for them to hear, loudly and clearly, the disapproval of the Commissioners intent on purchasing the former GIANT.

At that meeting, Savas Logothetides, who owns two businesses in Pottsville and serves on several boards with business interests. Notably, he’s the executive director of Pottsville Area Development Corp.

Logothetides spoke at a Commissioners meeting in late-July when news first broke of the County’s eyeing of the former grocery store possibly for a pre-release prison.

On Wednesday, he brought broader concerns in front of the Commissioners.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

First, he commented on the apparent secrecy with which the County is using leading up to it potentially buying this property. He expressed bewilderment at how the County could attempt to hide details about an appraisal it had done on the property.

Schuylkill County Administrator Gary Bender refused to tell a local news source the cost of that appraisal – done using public money – and then saying the appraisal price for the property was “privileged” information. Concealing that price means the public likely won’t know what the County spends on the property if it does purchase it until the ink on the deal is dry.

“While potentially legal, the fact that the appraised value is not being made public is a disservice to the taxpayers,” Logothetides said Wednesday. “The lack of transparency is becoming increasingly troublesome with regard to both this significant business transaction but a number of other items within the Courthouse.”

County Neglecting the City?

Logothetides also accused County Commissioners and administration of neglecting Pottsville in its bloodthirsty pursuit of the former GIANT store and property.

“As you all are fully aware, Pottsville is in a time of progressive transition. It would be largely and negatively affected with this hasty and short-sighted decision,” he said. “In addition, you are now looking at hurting the CIty and its taxpayers.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

“While I understand you have a duty to the entire county, it should not continually be at the expense of the City of Pottsville,” he added.

Logothetides also said, “There is private investment money interested in the property. Pottsville deserves better and I hope that you as elected officials will see through a short term solution for long term and progressive growth.”

Fight’s Not Over

Expect this verbal sparring to continue until a move is made by the County or Commissioners listen to reason and back off their intent on purchasing the property.


Subscribe to Coal Region Canary

Get email updates from Coal Region Canary by becoming a subscriber today. Just enter your email address below to get started!

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.


  1. R

    August 14, 2020 at 11:11 am

    I’m no realestate expert but doesn’t who a peoperty sells to depend on who the owner agrees to sell to?

    • Canary Commenter

      August 14, 2020 at 11:14 am

      Who would pass up government money … Especially if they’re tapping into the CARES Act money well that’s rumored to be happening?

  2. Anon E. Mouse

    August 14, 2020 at 1:14 pm

    Pottsville should be careful what they wish for. In two or three years, if the property remains vacant and starts to deteriorate, Pottsville will be begging the county to buy it. PADCO is the entity that should be trying to facilitate a deal instead of publicly berating the commissioners. This finger pointing will accomplish nothing; check your egos at the door and get down to work!

    • Canary Commenter

      August 14, 2020 at 1:25 pm

      They actually are in the process of working with an investor or investors who want the property. The County swooping in to grab this is not a good idea. And the Commissioners running to friendly media outlets to tell their side of the story instead of discussing this in the open at public meetings is just typical. This is how they ended up getting that property for the new, totally unnecessary STS depot. In that deal, they also took a valuable parcel off the market. The County government is big enough. If anything, they should be looking at downsizing, not expanding. The Welfare State needs to come to an end. Pottsville and Schuylkill County needs private investment. Otherwise, we’re doomed.

  3. Anon E. Mouse

    August 14, 2020 at 10:34 pm

    Interesting point you bring up about STS. I just recently heard about the Quirin property in St. Clair and the downtown Pottsville facility is just a little over 5 years old. Is ridership that great to support this expansion? That’s another one of those mysterious entities that don’t appear to be booming but get treated as if it were??

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More From The Canary

PA Lottery Numbers

Wednesday's winning numbers

PA Lottery Numbers

Sunday's winning numbers

PA Lottery Numbers

Thursday's winning numbers

Local Sports

Here is a weekly update on coal region natives in pro baseball.

Minersville News

Police have not released the name of the victim.

Pottsville News

A food truck would have a hard time replacing this atmosphere.

Schuylkill County Police News

The truck certainly has some unique characteristics.