Posted by on January 18, 2021 2:56 am

Tags:
Categories: Coal Region Newswire Coal Region Newswire 2 Local News

mahanoy area cheerleading case supreme court (1)

The US Supreme Court recently said it would hear the First Amendment case involving Mahanoy Area School District’s cheerleading team and a now-former student who was suspended from it due to a Snapchat post.

According to a recent announcement from ACLU Pennsylvania, which is representing “BL” in the case, SCOTUS agreed to hear Mahanoy Area’s appeal of a lower court ruling which said it didn’t have the authority to punish a student for off-campus activity.

BL has since been identified as Brandi Levy, a 2020 graduate of Mahanoy Area. She was suspended during her sophomore year in 2017 after she posted to Snapchat the following message:

“F*** school F*** softball F*** cheer F*** everything”

That message found its way in front of the Mahanoy Area cheerleading coach who suspended Levy for the entire year. Levy was mad because the coach told her she’d have to spend her sophomore year on the school’s JV cheer squad.

Levy filed a lawsuit against the school, claiming Mahanoy Area was violating her First Amendment right to free speech. It claimed that Levy was free to post whatever she wanted on Snapchat or anywhere because when she did it, it was on a weekend, not on school grounds, and she in no way was representing Mahanoy Area in an official capacity.

A federal judge ordered Mahanoy Area to let Levy back on the team.

Mahanoy Area Cheerleading Case Going to Supreme Court

Since the initial court filing, the two sides in this case have gone back-and-forth and Mahanoy Area has been determined to emerge victorious. And the school will get its case heard before the highest court in the land to find out if it did have the right to suspend Levy as they did a few years ago.

In a statement issued just after the New Year, Mahanoy Area says if the Supreme Court rules against it, it’ll leave them and other public schools powerless.

“That lawsuit has produced a judicial decision that leaves schools powerless to respond to speech that is directed at the school environment and would have a devastating effect on students’ well-being during the school day. The School District views that decision as inimical to our basic mission of safeguarding student welfare,” the statement reads. “Groups representing 1.7 million teachers and thousands of school districts nationwide have supported our efforts to reverse this unprecedented ruling in the Supreme Court, and we are hopeful that the Supreme Court will grant review.”

In response to learning the Supreme Court will hear the Mahanoy Area cheerleading case, Reggie Shuford, ACLU Pennsylvania executive director, says, “The beating heart of the Bill of the Rights is the idea that government power is limited. This public school wants the nation’s highest court to grant it sweeping new authority to punish students for speech that occurs away from school and causes no disruption. We look forward to explaining to the justices why the authority that the school is seeking is antithetical to the concept of free speech that is the foundation of the First Amendment.”

Sara Rose, the senior staff attorney at ACLU-PA, explains their defense in the upcoming case.

“Allowing public schools to punish student speech that takes place off-campus outside of school hours would teach students the wrong lesson – that they have no free-speech rights anywhere,” she says. “Requiring students to refrain from criticizing their sports team or extracurricular activity when they are off-campus as a condition of participating in that activity, as the school district did in this case, is inconsistent with core First Amendment values. We will explain to the court why the First Amendment limits the school’s ability to punish students for this type of speech, and we hope that the court will agree with the four previous rulings in this case that recognized that.”

ALSO READ:

Subscribe to Coal Region Canary

Get email updates from Coal Region Canary by becoming a subscriber today. Just enter your email address below to get started! [email-subscribers-form id="1"]

Canary on Social Media

Follow Coal Region Canary on Facebook.

And check us out on Twitter.

News Tips?

Let us know of news happening in your area. Use our NEWS TIPS ENTRY FORM

3 responses to Supreme Court Will Hear Mahanoy Area Cheerleading First Amendment Case

  1. Frank January 19th, 2021 at 6:43 am

    If you bad mouth your employer on social media, you can and probably should be terminated. Same with cheerleading. She can say what she wants about cheerleading, but don’t expect to remain on it then.

    Simply consequences.

    Reply

    • Jk January 19th, 2021 at 8:27 pm

      However she did no say F*** Mahanoy Area Cheerleading, F*** Mahanoy Area Softball. Sounds like the venting of a teenager. Did you ever have a bad day and say F*** this? If she was specific then I would agree she should be punished, the school district is not the replacement for her parents. District is holding an kid to adult standards. They have and will continue to spend unnecessary on litigation in a school district that is already strapped for cash. Doesn’t seem like a lot of common sense is being exercised by the district administration.

      Reply

  2. PTFloridians January 26th, 2021 at 8:54 pm

    The district goofs at MA didn’t have to make an issue of her social media posts, but could’ve found other ways of removal, if they were that bent on it…with that being said, it should strike everyone odd that the Supreme Court of the US could entertain a case about social media/cheerleader drama, but NOT the alleged election issues nationwide…amazing.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *